Grading students on a curve, especially a bell curve, stay an exceptionally disputable subject in educational institutions. For many years, the bell curve has been criticized by educational experts, teachers, and students, but it keeps on being utilized by certain schools, colleges, and universities. This assessment framework is generally utilized to decide students’ final GPA(Grade Point Average) and grade of their academic term. The most striking quality of the bell curve evaluating framework is the way through which grades are formed in the bell. Due to the curve, only a few students can get high grades, and the rest of the students get low grades, does not matter how well they perform in their assignments, tests, and exams.
Evaluation is simple and fair when teachers give grades to the students according to the individuals’ test scores or exams. It gets complicated when the bell curve is used for grading purposes. For a student, grading on a curve implies that the grades of all students in the class are relative to each other. While it is not needed to perform an evaluation on a bell curve, many teachers still use it to help weak students in passing. Grading on bell means adjusting the class exam score appropriately, so students with low marks get more marks to pass. It is clearly unfair to the students who get a high score.
Schools that use the bell curve grading system feel that an excessive amount of providing high grades will lose its value; that is why it is given to fewer students who directly impact the student’s education. Bell curve grading system affects the grades of intelligent students, and as a result, they lose interest in their studies and take help from online assignment help uk. In order to avoid injustice with those students, the bell curve seriously needs reform. Here are a few reasons why reforms are needed in the bell curve grading system.
- Grading should differentiate students on their ability basis
The purpose of grading students is to differentiate them based on their talent. High achieving students will get a high grade, and low achieving students will get a low grade. Recognizing students who is better and who is weak academically and then working on their weak areas to teach them effectively is the main job of teachers. But grading on the bell curve negates this purpose as students get the grade collectively, and not possible to know the total score of each student. It will make it impossible to know the difference between every student’s learning abilities if students do not know their weak areas, how they will work to improve them.
- Bell curve is unfair to high achieving students.
Students lose motivation for their studies when they do not get the grade that they deserve. Even after working hard and performing well in their tests and exams, they get low grades. Sometimes teachers are also under pressure to grade students on bell curve due to the university policy of grading students on this framework. Bell curve is an unfair practice that damages the student’s future by grading them less than they deserve. It is an odd method of assessment which do more harm than good to the students.
- Bell curve is against the true essences of education
Numerous teachers concur with the idea that education should be led in a climate that promotes interest in learning, individual development, collaboration skill, hard work and teamwork. Education should empower individuals to invest wholeheartedly and share their goals and accomplishment. Besides, teachers and students both experience the ill effects of having their achievement decided on the curve. The commitments and advancement that teachers might endeavour to give to children are not taken into consideration.
- Bell curve benefits underachievers
Bell curve main purpose is to compensate low performing students by giving them a passable grade and deducting it from high-grade students. Although it helps everyone to pass, it is not always the right solution. When low-grade students get a passing score, they will not work hard and strive for better. They will know that no matter how they perform in tests or exams, they will pass. It will cause a lack of motivation towards learning.
Bell curve also make teaching methods of all teachers equal. It means teachers who make a lot of effort in teaching their students are viewed the same as teachers who do not put any effort into teaching. And teachers will always be questioned if their students perform well. If their students get a high grade, they will always be suspected, whether it happens due to their effective learning or leniency of the bell curve grading system.
- Create enmity within the class
Some lucky students get grades that they do not deserve through the bell curve, and everyone knows it. Students who perform better hold grudges and hostility towards those students because they know that their grades are being deducted in order to uplift those students’ grades. It affects the classroom environment; high achieving students started blaming those academically weak students. And this process often leads to bullying. Even though it is not the fault of these students, but they are targeted because of it. Bell curve grading has been part of education for a long time, so it will not be easy to challenge this practice. “We have always done this way” is the only argument they provide about every traditional method. Even though the fact they are incapable and conceivably destructive towards students. In order to challenge these traditional methods, educational experts need thoughtfulness, research-based other options and smart idea to implement. You can not counter with just an enthusiastically arguable stance. To prevail with regards to abolishing old practices, you should have new methods to replace their spots. It implies that experts should be acquainted with a deep understanding of assessment and what turns out to be best for children. And they should introduce more effective practices and policies to help learn and improve the impression of students as learners. Educational experts who dare to question traditional methodologies and work hard against them will surely get fruitful results.